WDTD 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 | 𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 #𝟯𝟲𝟮
One of the most expensive words in cybersecurity is:
“𝗔𝘀𝘀𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗱.”
We assumed the vendor was secure.
We assumed the backup was working.
We assumed MFA was enabled everywhere.
We assumed the access was removed.
We assumed someone was monitoring it.
We assumed the risk had already been addressed.
And that’s usually where problems begin.
Over the years, I’ve noticed that major security incidents rarely come from things organizations knew were broken.
They come from things organizations believed were working.
That’s a very different risk.
Known issues get attention.
Assumptions often don’t.
During audits, some of the most significant findings originate from simple verification exercises:
- Access reviews that were assumed complete
- Security controls that were assumed enabled
- Disaster recovery processes that were assumed tested
- Vendor assessments that were assumed current
- AI governance controls that were assumed implemented
Nobody intentionally ignored the risk.
The organization simply stopped validating the assumption.
That’s why mature security programs develop a habit that goes beyond compliance.
They verify.
Repeatedly.
A useful leadership exercise is to ask:
“𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗯𝗶𝗴𝗴𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝘀𝘀𝘂𝗺𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘀𝗲𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗺 𝗶𝘀 𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴?”
Then test them.
Not review them.
Not discuss them.
Test them.
Because assumptions have a way of becoming embedded in processes, dashboards, reports, and governance discussions.
Until one day reality disagrees.
And reality always wins.
The strongest audit findings are not about discovering something new.
They’re about validating whether what everyone believes is actually true.
In cybersecurity, confidence is valuable.
Verification is priceless.
Leave a Reply